Abstract

The polyhistidine tag (His-tag) is one of the most popular protein tags used in the life sciences. Traditionally, the detection of His-tagged proteins relies on immunoblotting with anti-His antibodies. This approach is laborious for certain applications, such as protein purification, where time and simplicity are critical. The His-tag can also be directly detected by metal ion–loaded nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid–based chelator heads conjugated to fluorophores, which is a convenient alternative method to immunoblotting. Typically, such chelator heads are conjugated to either green or red fluorophores, the detection of which requires specialized excitation sources and detection systems. Here, we demonstrate that post-run staining is ideal for His-tag detection by metal ion–loaded and fluorescently labeled chelator heads in PAGE and blot membranes. Additionally, by comparing the performances of different chelator heads, we show how differences in microscopic affinity constants translate to macroscopic differences in the detection limits in environments with limited diffusion, such as PAGE. On the basis of these results, we devise a simple approach, called UVHis-PAGE, that uses metal ion–loaded and fluorescently labeled chelator heads to detect His-tagged proteins in PAGE and blot membranes. Our method uses a UV transilluminator as an excitation source, and the results can be visually inspected by the naked eye.

Highlights

  • The polyhistidine tag (His-tag) is one of the most popular protein tags used in the life sciences

  • The His-tag can be directly detected by metal ion–loaded nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid–based chelator heads conjugated to fluorophores, which is a convenient alternative method to immunoblotting

  • We demonstrate that post-run staining is ideal for His-tag detection by metal ion–loaded and fluorescently labeled chelator heads in PAGE and blot membranes

Read more

Summary

Results

To build the UV–based detection system for His6-tagged proteins in PAGE and blotting membrane, two initial choices must be made: a chelator head and a UV-excitable dye. Choice of chelator head and staining method for highly sensitive fluorescent detection We hypothesized that reducing the harsh conditions of SDSPAGE during the initial incubation and complex migration in the pre-run staining protocol [17] can increase the detection performance of a given chelator head. To evaluate this hypothesis, we implemented a post-run staining protocol (Fig. 1) that enabled us to compare the detection limit of Ni21-monoNTAand Ni21-trisNTA-coupled fluorophores directly. We preferred this protein fusion because of its relatively small size, which minimizes the chance of unspecific binding

90 Absorbance
Discussion
Experimental Procedures
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call