Abstract
Theories of early language development differ in the degree of abstraction granted to the early stages, and in the perspectives these adopt with regards to the interaction between lexicon and syntax. The paradigm associated with generative approaches and the continuity hypothesis attributes early complexity and abstraction to access to innate knowledge of structure. The paradigm generally identified with emergentist/general learning approaches assumes complexity is an emergent property that arises from experience. Comparing paradigms is difficult because they pursue different goals: one focuses on developmental stages and the other on the nature of representation at each stage. The core claim of generative approaches is that the product of lexical learning must interface explicitly with a system capable of formal productivity and of supporting compositionality. The present article reviews evidence for productivity in early negation, on the growth of syntactic recursion, and on ellipsis construction, and examines the notion of merge and compositionality and their explanatory role in language and language development.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.