Abstract
Abstract Three simple statistical tests (the Bartlett test, the log-ANOVA test, and the Fain test) were investigated for detecting the segregation of major genes controlling a quantitative trait in half-diallel mating populations. Eight experimental diallel progeny populations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) from a breeding program were analyzed to detect major gene segregation for 6 yr tree height. The results from three simple tests indicated that there could be major gene segregation for 6 yr height in three diallels. Data with different degrees of major and polygenic effects were simulated with the same mating and field experimental design for further evaluation of these simple tests. Statistical powers of detection were assessed for a major gene with two alleles plus the polygenic background of general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects. The robustness of methods to the presence of half-sib relationships, a skewed phenotypic distribution, and unbalanced data were evaluated. The Bartlett test was the most powerful, but was sensitive to half-sib relationship and skewness. The log-ANOVA test was as powerful as the Bartlett test, but was robust to half-sib relationship and skewness. The Fain test was less powerful but less sensitive to skewness than the Bartlett test. The major gene effect (percent of total phenotypic variance) and dominance level of the major gene were the two most important factors affecting the power of detection. The power for the Bartlett and log-ANOVA test increased with the increment of polygenic heritability. The ratio of dominance to additive variance for polygenic inheritance had little effect on the power for the Bartlett and log-ANOVA tests. The log-ANOVA test is the most desired simple test for detecting major gene segregation in a diallel population with half-sib structures. Simple tests can be used to screen breeding populations for major genes affecting tree growth, and the information can be useful to speed up traditional tree breeding programs. FOR. SCI. 49(2):268–278.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.