Simple limbal epithelial transplantation versus cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation in ocular burns

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) with cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) for the management of total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in eyes with unilateral ocular burns. DesignRandomized controlled trial. Methods100 patients (100 eyes) with unilateral total LSCD following ocular burns undergoing autologous Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation (LSCT) were enrolled and randomized into SLET and CLET groups. Restoration of an epithelized ocular surface was the primary outcome measure. Occurrences of progressive conjunctivalization and persistent epithelial defects postoperatively were considered surgical failures. ResultsMean age was 20.2 ± 13.1 years (SLET) and 22.6 ± 14.3 years (CLET) (p = 0.363). Alkali burn was the most common causative factor in both groups and had comparable mean logMAR BCVA at presentation [SLET: 2.33 ± 0.5, CLET: 2.23 ± 1.48 (p = 0.652)]. Median time interval between injury and surgical intervention was 18 months (SLET) and 12 months (CLET) (p = 0.06). 88 % eyes in SLET group maintained a stable ocular surface at 1 year period versus CLET group (86 %) (p = 0.999). Mean logMAR BCVA significantly improved in both groups with SLET having significantly better BCVA versus CLET at 6 months (p = 0.0390), 1 year (p = 0.0001), 2 year (p = 0.0001) and 3 years (p = 0.0001) follow up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was statistically insignificant amongst the 2 groups (p = 0.590). ConclusionsCompared to CLET, SLET is equally efficacious in restoring and maintaining a stable ocular surface in eyes with total LSCD due to ocular burns, with the added advantage of providing superior visual outcomes.