Abstract
Simple evidence principle in the Commercial Court is not easy to imagine. Simple evidence (sumir) currently still uses civil procedural law as a formal source in court. In addition it exists in various other regulations such as bankruptcy. The purposes of this study are 1). Analyze simple evidence (sumir) practices in bankruptcy cases in court, especially civil courts. 2). Analyze the ius constituendum regulation of simple evidence (sumir) of bankruptcy cases in court based on civil procedural law.This research used method of normative legal research. It also used doctrinal research. The approach is carried out using the following methods: statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.The results of the research indicated that simple evidence (sumir) practices in bankruptcy cases in court, especially civil courts, are not as simple as one imagine because in reality there are inconsistencies in the panel of judges in examining cases. Afterward, the ius constituendum regulation for simple evidence (mumir) of bankruptcy cases in court based on civil procedural law is absolutely necessary to prevent inconsistencies in interpretation between the panel of judges examining the case.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
