Abstract

Enteral intake of a mixture of inert, non-metabolic monosaccharide and disaccharide probes, followed by measurement of their urinary probe ratio, is a well known method to investigate gut permeability. However, most applications lack sensitivity, thus a large amount of especially the disaccharide lactulose has to be ingested. This may cause diarrhoea, which influences the outcome of the test. Recently, a new fluorescent label 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate hydrazine (FMOC-hydrazine) was introduced, which reacts with reducing sugars to form stable and highly fluorescent single peak derivatives in organic medium. We applied this reagent to develop a sensitive measurement of reducing sugar probes in aqueous samples (e.g. urine). The presented method has a linear response for each sugar derivative between 1 and 1250 pmol with an R 2 ranging from 0.9997 for lactulose to 0.9999 for rhamnose. The limit of detection, calculated as a signal-to-noise ratio of three, was 0.05 pmol for lactulose and 0.01 pmol for rhamnose, xylose and 3-O-methyl-D-glucose, corresponding to urine concentrations of 0.11 μmol/1 for lactulose and 0.02 μmo1/l for rhamnose, xylose and 3-O-methyl-D-glucose. Compared to other tests, the limit of detection is very low. This enabled a reduction in the enteral intake of the disaccharide lactulose from 6–10 g to 1.5 g, thereby minimizing the chance of introducing diarrhoea. The coefficient of variation was below 3% both in standards and urine samples. After spiking the urine with the saccharides a recovery of 102% for lactulose, 101% for rhamnose, xylose and 3-O-methyl-D-glucose was found. In order to evaluate the presented method we compared the lactulose rhamnose ratio measured in urine of healthy human volunteers and kept the ingested dose in agreement with literature values. Furthermore, the ratio was measured after 3, 6 and 9 h to establish the minimal response time required to measure correct ratios. We found that even after 3 h the ratio was stable at a value of 0.0133 which is comparable to literature values (0.008-0.052).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.