Abstract

Abstract Adult subjects were asked to rate a number of figures according to their perceived usefulness in a real-world task. An independent group of subjects then learned to classify these figures into one of two categories. One group of subjects were provided with category labels designed to facilitate the use of their pre-existing knowledge in the learning task and a second group were given nonsense labels. Predictions derived from similarity-based (prototype and exemplar) models of categorisation were compared with those based upon the rated usefulness of the exemplars. The contribution of preexisting knowledge to accurate responding and to typicality judgements was greater with meaningful rather than nonsense category labels. An examination of test phase performance in the two groups indicated that the effect of providing a meaningful theme extended beyond a redistribution of feature weights during encoding. These results were replicated and extended in a second study in which the categories to be lea...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.