Abstract

Limb dominance is evident in many daily activities, leading to the prominent idea that each hemisphere of the brain specializes in controlling different aspects of movement. Past studies suggest that the dominant arm is primarily controlled via an internal model of limb dynamics that enables the nervous system to produce efficient movements. In contrast, the nondominant arm may be primarily controlled via impedance mechanisms that rely on the strong modulation of sensory feedback from individual joints to control limb posture. We tested whether such differences are evident in behavioral responses and stretch reflexes following sudden displacement of the arm during posture control. Experiment 1 applied specific combinations of elbow-shoulder torque perturbations (the same for all participants). Peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles were not statistically different between the two arms. Experiment 2 induced specific combinations of joint motion (the same for all participants). Again, peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles did not differ statistically when countering the imposed loads with each arm. Moderate to strong correlations were found between stretch reflexes and behavioral responses to the perturbations with the two arms across both experiments. Collectively, the results do not support the idea that the dominant arm specializes in exploiting internal models and the nondominant arm in impedance control by increasing reflex gains to counter sudden loads imposed on the arms during posture control.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A prominent hypothesis is that the nervous system controls the dominant arm through predictive internal models and the nondominant arm through impedance mechanisms. We tested whether stretch reflexes of muscles in the two arms also display such specialization during posture control. Nearly all behavioral responses and stretch reflexes did not differ statistically but were strongly correlated between the arms. The results indicate individual signatures of feedback control that are common for the two arms.

Highlights

  • Humans prefer to use one arm over the other when performing motor actions like throwing a ball or eating soup with a spoon

  • The preference for performing motor actions with one arm is referred to as limb dominance, with the dominance of a particular side being referred to as handedness

  • Because of the similarity of outcome measures across the two arms, we investigated the relationship in motor behavior, preferred torque direction (PTD)/preferred motion direction (PMD), and response magnitudes between the dominant and nondominant arms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans prefer to use one arm over the other when performing motor actions like throwing a ball or eating soup with a spoon. The preference for performing motor actions with one arm is referred to as limb dominance, with the dominance of a particular side being referred to as handedness. About 90% of the human population are right-hand dominant [1] and display preference for performing motor actions with their right arm. Limb dominance may arise from asymmetries in neural processing across the cerebral hemispheres [5], like those shown for language [6,7,8]. A prominent hypothesis is that limb dominance arises because each hemisphere specializes in different aspects of arm control [9,10,11].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call