Abstract
Comparison was made of the apical microleakage of retrograde fillings with amalgam and with silver glass ionomer cements using a modified dye penetration method. Forty instrumented human teeth were divided into four groups. Each group was characterized by a different retrograde filling material or technique: Group 1--silver glass ionomer (SGI); group 2--SGI with previous acid wash of the cavity; group 3--SGI in a previously acid washed cavity, protected with varnish; and group 4--zinc-free amalgam. A paper cone for dye adsorption analysis was placed in contact with retrofill and the main canal was obturated with thermoplasticized gutta-percha. All teeth were coated, immersed in methylene blue dye, and evacuated to assure complete penetration of the dye in any possible void. Later the teeth were cleared and evaluated under stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis showed that group 1 had the least microleakage of all. In addition, the biocompatibility of the SGI and varnish was compared with that of amalgam using the 51Cr release evaluation method. The results showed that SGI and varnish were less cytotoxic than amalgam. It was concluded that SGI cement can be considered an alternative retrograde filling material.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
