Abstract
Chemical vapor phase deposition was used to create hydrophobic nanostructured surfaces on glass slides. Subsequently, hydrophilic channels were created by sputtering a metal catalyst on the channels while masking the outside. The surface tension gradient between the hydrophilic surface in the channels and the outside hydrophobicity formed the open-channel system. The reduction of para-nitrophenol (PNP) was studied on these devices. When compared to nanostructure-free reference systems, the created nanostructures, namely, silicone nanofilaments (SNFs) and nano-bagels, had superior catalytic performance (73% and 66% conversion to 55% at 0.5 µL/s flow rate using 20 nm platinum) and wall integrity; therefore, they could be readily used multiple times. The created nanostructures were stable under the reaction conditions, as observed with scanning electron microscopy. Transition electron microscopy studies of platinum-modified SNFs revealed that the catalyst is present as nanoparticles ranging up to 13 nm in size. By changing the target in the sputter coating unit, molybdenum, gold, nickel and copper were evaluated for their catalytic efficiency. The relative order was platinum < gold = molybdenum < nickel < copper. The decomposition of sodium borohydride (NaBH4) by platinum as a concurrent reaction to the para-nitrophenol reduction terminates the reaction before completion, despite a large excess of reducing agent. Gold had the same catalytic rate as molybdenum, while nickel was two times and copper about four times faster than gold. In all cases, there was a clear improvement in catalysis of silicone nanofilaments compared to a flat reference system.
Highlights
Microfluidic devices are widely used in the biomedical field for applications such as nucleic acid and protein analysis, cellular studies, binding affinity measurements, or immunoassays [1,2]
There was a clear improvement in catalysis of silicone nanofilaments compared to a flat reference system
A mask was cut from cellophane using a template to improve the consistency and placed on the coated slide (c)
Summary
Microfluidic devices are widely used in the biomedical field for applications such as nucleic acid and protein analysis, cellular studies, binding affinity measurements, or immunoassays [1,2]. Only a few researchers have focused on the advantages of heterogeneous catalysis in microfluidic devices [3]. Depositing a heterogeneous catalyst on the walls of microfluidic devices results in an exceptional catalyst-to-reagent ratio [3]. Removing the product from the system and collecting it under appropriate conditions prevents undesired further reactions or decomposition that could occur if the product had longer exposure to the reaction conditions. This has led, in some cases, to microfluidic systems that outperformed batch reactions in terms of yield and selectivity [4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.