Abstract

This article will explore the extraordinary juvenile archive of Eva Knatchbull-Hugessen. It will consider how young people could be active participants in the shaping of family archives, leading to the curation of more dissonant histories. In Eva’s case this involved writing in tandem with, but also in counterpoint to, the journals of her father, Edward. The survival of contemporaneous diaries from daughter and father enables micro-comparisons of daily entries to interrogate the diverse and multilayered strategies of evasion, obliqueness, and self-censorship they deployed in the intricate and fluctuating construction of authorial selves. Edward’s journals reveal his intimate friendships with a number of young men and reference his wife’s distressed response. The article considers how far it is possible to trace the implications of hidden queer histories through the study of a juvenile archive. In so doing it delineates how, despite a loving relationship between father and daughter, Eva’s diaries quietly identified many facets of Edward’s patriarchal masculinity. She also deployed comic ‘entertainment narratives’ to record awkward family moments, but used silence to register dissent from other aspects of her father’s behaviour. Exploring juvenile life writing, it will be suggested, requires a new archival hermeneutics in which the meanings of archives and their construction can reveal hidden dynamics as well as pointing to the cultural agency of young diarists.

Highlights

  • The elite families of Victorian Britain were assiduous archivists of their own past.[1]

  • As Arianne Baggerman has noted, ‘the family archive is not a neutral place [...] but a paper bulwark, built and rebuilt by generations, with a specific function: to preserve and protect a common family identity.’[2]. This emphasis upon the conscious assemblage of family papers is a key insight upon which this article will seek to build, for archives are not necessarily monolithic in their meaning and purpose, and practices of retention can be more arbitrary than Baggerman here suggests

  • Through examining the juvenile diaries of Eva Knatchbull-Hugessen (1861–1895) in comparison with those of her father Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen (1829–1893), this article will consider how young people participated in the shaping of family archives, leading to the curation of more dissonant histories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The elite families of Victorian Britain were assiduous archivists of their own past.[1]. Through examining the juvenile diaries of Eva Knatchbull-Hugessen (1861–1895) in comparison with those of her father Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen (1829–1893), this article will consider how young people participated in the shaping of family archives, leading to the curation of more dissonant histories.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call