Abstract
A new type of non-classical 2D contact problem formulated over non-convex admissible sets is proposed. Specifically, we suppose that a composite body in its undeformed state touches a wedge-shaped rigid obstacle at a single contact point. Composite bodies under investigation consist of an elastic matrix and a rigid inclusion. In this case, the displacements on the set, corresponding to a rigid inclusion, have a predetermined structure that describes possible parallel shifts and rotations of the inclusion. The rigid inclusion is located on the external boundary and has the form of a wedge. The presence of the rigid inclusion imposes a new type of non-penetration condition for certain geometrical configurations of the obstacle and the body near the contact point. The sharp-shaped edges of the obstacle effect such sets of admissible displacements that may be non-convex. For the case of a thin rigid inclusion, which is described by a curve and a volume (bulk) rigid inclusion specified in a subdomain, the energy minimization problems are formulated. The solvability of the corresponding boundary value problems is proved, based on analysis of auxiliary minimization problems formulated over convex sets. Qualitative properties of the auxiliary variational problems are revealed; in particular, we have found their equivalent differential formulations. As the most important result of this study, we provide justification for a new type of mathematical model for 2D contact problems for reinforced composite bodies.
Highlights
There are various studies related to problems describing contact of elastic bodies with rigid or elastic obstacles, see for example [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
In contrast to [16], we propose a class of non-linear contact problems, where non-penetration conditions can be written for a single point located on the sharp edge
The obtained results justify the new class of point-contact problems
Summary
There are various studies related to problems describing contact of elastic bodies with rigid or elastic obstacles, see for example [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The differential formulation of (12) can be obtained without additional regularity assumptions on the solution U2 In this case, the expressions for the boundary conditions take the form of duality relations in the space of distributions. We note that the values σν(U2ω)−, στ(U2ω)− can be non-zero on (∂ω \ γ)−, despite of σν(U2ω)+ = 0, στ(U2ω)+ = 0 on (∂ω \ γ)+ due to εij(U2ω) = 0 in the rigid inclusion ω, i, j = 1, 2 This case arises when the jumps of functions σij(U2ω), i, j = 1, 2, are not equal to zero on (∂ω \ γ)− provided that U2ω ∈ H(Ω), but U2ω ∈/ H2(Ω)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
