Abstract

To compare the diagnostic and staging efficacy of PET/diagnostic-level CT (PET/DxCT) and PET/low-dose CT (PET/LDCT) in pretreatment pediatric lymphoma patients and to estimate the reduction of the CT effective dose in the PET/CT scan. One hundred and five pediatric patients who underwent total-body PET/CT examination were enrolled and divided into the DxCT group (n = 47) and LDCT group (n = 58) according to their dose levels. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PET/DxCT and PET/LDCT for detecting the involvement of lymph node, spleen, bone marrow, and other extranodal organs in pretreatment lymphoma were compared. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the integral efficiency. The staging accuracies based on PET/DxCT and PET/LDCT were also evaluated. Dosimetry was calculated for DxCT and LDCT, and the reduction in the effective dose was estimated. In the diagnosis of nodal, splenic, bone marrow, and other extranodal involvement, the differences in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV between PET/LDCT and PET/DxCT were not significant (all p values ∈ [0.332, 1.000]). Both modalities had accuracies above 90% and the ROC analysis indicated good or high efficiency in diagnosing all patterns of lymphoma involvement. PET/LDCT and PET/DxCT each had a staging accuracy of 89.7% and 89.4%, respectively. LDCT had a comparable image quality score with DxCT, with a significant increase in noise (p < 0.001) and a 66.1% reduction in effective dose. PET/LDCT allowed for a 66.1% CT effective dose reduction compared to PET/DxCT in pediatric lymphoma patients without compromising the diagnostic and staging efficacy. • Pediatric lymphoma patients can benefit from a reduced effective dose of PET/CT. • This retrospective study showed that the diagnostic and staging efficacies of PET/low-dose CT are comparable to those of PET/diagnostic-level CT, both with satisfactory efficiency in diagnosing all patterns of lymphoma involvement. • PET/low-dose CT allowed for a 66.1% CT effective dose reduction compared to PET/diagnostic-level CT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.