Abstract

The late-stage evolution of leucogranite magmas and related magmatic-hydrothermal processes which could lead to rare-metal mineralization are still poorly studied in the Himalayas. Since tourmaline is among the minerals that are present in evolved granites of the Himalayas, the geochemistry of this mineral, and in particular the boron isotopic composition, is a powerful tool to trace evolution processes and sources of these magmas. This study focuses on the analysis of tourmalines in the Gurla Mandhata tourmaline leucogranites (GMTL) from the northwest of the Himalayan orogen. Two generations of tourmaline show clear differences in texture, major element, and B isotopic compositions. Early-stage tourmalines have high-Mg# [Mg/(Mg + Fe) 0.39–0.45] and occur as inclusions in late-stage tourmalines [Mg# <0.34] and other minerals. The δ11B values are in the range of −7 ~ −8‰ for the early-stage tourmaline and in the range of −12 ~ −15‰ for the late-stage tourmaline. The occurrence of tourmalines with contrasting B isotopic compositions from the same leucogranite body (even in a same specimen) can be explained either by mixing of magmas from different sources with different B isotopic compositions or by remarkable B isotopic fractionation during magma differentiation. As indicated by mineral textures and compositions, the mixing of different magma batches can be ruled out as a major cause in the case of GMTL. Alternatively, the bimodal distribution of tourmaline δ11B most likely suggests the occurrence of multiple-stage B isotopic fractionation during the magma evolution. Our modeling based on Rayleigh fractionation shows that this fractionation may have been induced mainly by extraction of fluid at a late magmatic stage, but crystallization of tourmaline may have also played a minor role. Interestingly, a compilation of δ11B values (>260 data points) in magmatic tourmaline from eight Himalayan leucogranite bodies systematically shows a similar bimodal distribution (i.e., with peaks at −7‰ and − 13‰), implying that this significant B isotopic fractionation may be a common scenario during magma evolution of the Himalayan leucogranites. However, multiple magma sources with contrasting B isotopic compositions cannot be fully ruled out for explaining the bimodal distribution of B isotopic composition. Combining our results with SrNd isotopic and other geochemical characteristics of the Himalayan leucogranites, we propose that the granitic magmas with high δ11B originated either from fluid-present melting involving boron-rich fluids, or more probably from dehydration melting of the Greater Himalayan Sequence that had been metasomatized by boron-rich fluids. The geological context implies that these fluids were probably derived from dehydration of mica-rich rocks from the Lesser Himalayan Sequence underlying the Greater Himalayan Sequence.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call