Abstract

Preservation of woodland key habitats has become an integral part of biodiversity-oriented forest management in northern Europe. In Finland, brook-side spruce forests constitute the most important key-habitat type in terms of total area and timber volume. Our aim was to compare polypore diversity and the occurrence of red-listed species between brook-side key habitats and comparable sites of managed forest as controls. Furthermore, we assessed the importance of stand structural features to polypore communities, and contrasted regions with different land-use history. Altogether 69 key habitats and 70 controls were inventoried in four regions across southern Finland. A total of 28,023 surveyed dead-wood units had 3,307 occurrences of 114 species of which 25 species were red-listed. Key habitats hosted on average 28% (about two species) more polypore species (mainly deciduous-specialists) than controls because of a larger average volume of dead wood and a higher proportion of dead deciduous wood. However, the average number of red-listed species was low and did not differ between the two forest categories. We detected a landscape effect connected with the intensity and length of forest management history, with the highest numbers of all and red-listed species per site in eastern Finland. Volume and diversity of dead wood were the most important variables explaining variation in species richness. Presently, key habitats in managed forests appear to contribute only little to the conservation of red-listed polypore species.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call