Abstract

Electrolyte additives are pivotal for stable cycling of rechargeable lithium ion batteries (LIBs), which dictate the creation of the protective interphases on electrodes. Many additives have been proposed but less knowledge is available on the relationship between their molecular structure and interphase stability. This research compares three electrolyte additives with systematic changes in their cyclic ethylene sulfate structures, i.e. 1,3,2−dioxathiolane−2,2−dioxide (DTD), 4−methyl−1,3,2−dioxathiolane−2,2− dioxide (MDTD) and 4−propyl−[1,3,2] dioxathiolane−2,2−dioxide (PDTD) to investigate their effects on the performance of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2/artificial graphite lithium ion pouch cells at high temperature. Comprehensive characterizations reveal that all these additives exhibit similar oxidative and reductive activity, but they lead to diverse long−term cycling performance at 55 °C. The sulfate species derived from the propyl functionalized PDTD form the most effective cathode and anode interphases in preventing electrolyte decomposition and improving cycling capabilities, with capacity retention of 85 % after 900 cycles at 55 °C. Meanwhile, a super stable (3000 cycles), high−capacity (1668 mAh) pouch cell is constructed at 25 °C. This work paves a road to design electrolyte additive more efficiently for high−energy−density LIBs at elevated temperature.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.