Significance of Body Weight as a Performance Parameter

Abstract

The laying performance of different body weight classes, defined on both a genetic and phenotypic scale, were compared. The distribution of pedigreed Leghorn breeders of both sexes were truncated on the basis of 30 week body weight into two classes: light (L) or heavy (H). The progeny then were classified according to parental mating types as either L × L, L × H, or H × H. Differences among these progeny groups defined the genetic scale. The phenotypic scale was derived separately by phenotypic truncation of the progeny distribution into light (L), medium (M), and heavy (H) body weight classes at 30 weeks.Differences in rate of lay and in egg mass output between classes were in poor agreement with respect to the two scales. Light birds were poorest egg producers on the phenotypic scale but were the best egg producers on the genetic scale. Superior egg production by the heavy-bird class during the late spring and early summer months of the year could not be demonstrated. Deviations in body weight sharply reflected poorer performance on the phenotypic scale but not the genetic scale. This emphasizes the dominant role of management, feeding, and disease control over the genetic influence in maintaining optimum size for satisfactory productivity.