Abstract

BackgroundComplex movement sequences are composed of segments with different levels of functionality: intended segments towards a goal and segments that spontaneously occur largely beneath our awareness. It is not known if these spontaneously-occurring segments could be informative of the learning progression in naïve subjects trying to skillfully master a new sport routine.MethodsTo address this question we asked if the hand speed variability could be modeled as a stochastic process where each trial speed depended on the speed of the previous trial. We specifically asked if the hand speed maximum from a previous trial could accurately predict the maximum speed of a sub-sequent trial in both intended and spontaneous movement segments. We further asked whether experts and novices manifested similar models, despite different kinematic dynamics and assessed the predictive power of the spontaneous fluctuations in the incidental motions.ResultsWe found a simple power rule to parameterize speed variability for expert and novices with accurate predictive value despite randomly instructed speed levels and training contexts. This rule on average tended to yield similar exponent across speed levels for intended motion segments. Yet for the spontaneous segments the speed fluctuations had exponents that changed as a function of speed level and training context. Two conditions highlighted the expert performance: broad bandwidth of velocity-dependent parameter values and low noise-to-signal ratios that unambiguously distinguished between training regimes. Neither of these was yet manifested in the novices.ConclusionsWe suggest that the statistics of intended motions may be a predictor of overall expertise level, whereas those of spontaneously occurring incidental motions may serve to track learning progression in different training contexts. These spontaneous fluctuations may help the central systems to kinesthetically discriminate the peripheral re-afferent patterns of movement variability associated with changes in movement speed and training context. We further propose that during learning the acquisition of both broad bandwidth of speeds and low noise-to-signal ratios may be critical to build a verifiable kinesthetic (movement) percept and reach the type of automaticity that an expert acquires.

Highlights

  • Motor variability has emerged as an important component of movement control research, informative of learning and optimization strategies in the nervous system [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

  • The instruction to attend to the full loop of the routine and use the visual feedback to correct the motions changed the spontaneous nature of the retractions. This effect was captured in the statistics of the maximum speed which rendered the strike and retractions indistinguishable

  • This work studied the statistics of velocity-dependent parameters from the hand movement trajectories of novices and experts at martial arts routines as their motions unfolded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motor variability has emerged as an important component of movement control research, informative of learning and optimization strategies in the nervous system [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The relevant roles of movement variability in the development of motor strategies was pointed out by Bernstein who observed that we do not perform the same movement exactly the same way twice [10] Such inherent variability in our motions contributes during early development to the formation of a motor percept [11] that assists us in transitioning from spontaneous movements to goal-intended actions under voluntary control [12,13,14,15,16]. The stable unimodal profile generally recovers from such alterations [19,20] unless the system is compromised by stroke or neurodegenerative disorders [21,22] In this regard the variability of velocity-dependent parameters such as the maximum speed, the maximum acceleration and their timing may serve as an amplifier of somatosensory processes. It is not known if these spontaneously-occurring segments could be informative of the learning progression in naïve subjects trying to skillfully master a new sport routine

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call