Abstract
This paper examines how the possibility of renegotiation affects contractual outcomes in signaling games when an infinite number of rounds of renegotiations are allowed before contracts are executed. The main results of the paper are (1) contracts may still contain distortions, (2) the popular 'efficient' separating-equilibrium outcome is never an equilibrium outcome with renegotiation, (3) incentive-compatibility constraints can be generalized to incorporate renegotiation, (4) equilibrium outcomes can be separating and nevertheless depend on the uninformed player's prior, and (5) renegotiation in signaling games may lead to outcomes similar to equilibrium outcomes of screening games in which multiple contract purchases are allowed. Copyright 1993 by The Econometric Society.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
