Abstract

Many extracellular signals act via the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade in which kinetics, cell-cell variability, and sensitivity of the ERK response can all influence cell fate. Here we used automated microscopy to explore the effects of ERK-mediated negative feedback on these attributes in cells expressing endogenous ERK or ERK2-GFP reporters. We studied acute rather than chronic stimulation with either epidermal growth factor (ErbB1 activation) or phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PKC activation). In unstimulated cells, ERK-mediated negative feedback reduced the population-average and cell-cell variability of the level of activated ppERK and increased its robustness to changes in ERK expression. In stimulated cells, negative feedback (evident between 5 min and 4 h) also reduced average levels and variability of phosphorylated ERK (ppERK) without altering the “gradedness” or sensitivity of the response. Binning cells according to total ERK expression revealed, strikingly, that maximal ppERK responses initially occur at submaximal ERK levels and that this non-monotonic relationship changes to an increasing, monotonic one within 15 min. These phenomena occur in HeLa cells and MCF7 breast cancer cells and in the presence and absence of ERK-mediated negative feedback. They were best modeled assuming distributive (rather than processive) activation. Thus, we have uncovered a novel, time-dependent change in the relationship between total ERK and ppERK levels that persists without negative feedback. This change makes acute response kinetics dependent on ERK level and provides a “gating” or control mechanism in which the interplay between stimulus duration and the distribution of ERK expression across cells could modulate the proportion of cells that respond to stimulation.

Highlights

  • The mechanisms underlying acute ERK signaling are poorly understood

  • Many extracellular signals act via the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade in which kinetics, cell-cell variability, and sensitivity of the ERK response can all influence cell fate

  • Knockdown efficiency is Ͼ90%, and the reporter mirrors endogenous ERK activity [27, 29, 34]. This again revealed more sustained elevation of phosphorylated ERK (ppERK) with PDBu and that both stimuli increased the proportion of ERK2 in the nucleus, effects that were again more sustained with PDBu (Fig. 1D)

Read more

Summary

Background

The mechanisms underlying acute ERK signaling are poorly understood. Results: Feedback influences basal and acutely stimulated ERK responses but does not render signaling kinetics robust to ERK concentration. Binning cells according to total ERK expression revealed, strikingly, that maximal ppERK responses initially occur at submaximal ERK levels and that this non-monotonic relationship changes to an increasing, monotonic one within 15 min These phenomena occur in HeLa cells and MCF7 breast cancer cells and in the presence and absence of ERK-mediated negative feedback. When we explored relationships between total ERK and ppERK under short term stimulation, we observed maximal ppERK levels at submaximal ERK expression levels soon after stimulation (at 5 min) and a switch to monotonic behavior within 15 min of stimulation This occurred in two cell types (HeLa and MCF7 cells) and at a broad range of EGF concentrations in both the presence and absence of negative feedback. In the non-equilibrium conditions of acute stimulation, there is a novel time-dependent change in the relationship between ERK and ppERK levels that persists in the presence of negative feedback, is suggestive of distributive activation, and makes acute ERK response kinetics dependent upon ERK expression levels in our system

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.