Abstract

The development of the US foreign policy tools in the 20th century resulted in sanctions becoming one of the most convenient means for achieving administration’s goals on the international arena, as well as a useful tool in domestic politics. Institutionally established within the scope of the executive branch, buttressed by the US dominance in the world economy and viewed as a “humane” way of influencing foreign elites, it does not demand significant political capital and, as a result, can be implemented without deep strategic thinking. Current US policy towards Russia is constrained by the framework of the sanctions regime, created by Barak Obama Administration in 2014. This regime is inherently inert and is likely to determine the scope and methods of the US policy towards Russia for the foreseeable future regardless of the priorities of the country’s leadership. This article seeks to study the creation of the regime and explain the logic of decision-making process regarding this issue. Utilizing the approach of Francesco Giumelli, who developed a system of factors to explain the logic of a sanctions policy, the author shows that the US sanction policy towards Russia was framed by the desire to demonstrate the ability to mobilize international community and reaffirm its commitments to the security of the Eastern Europe. Low profile of the Ukraine issue on the US foreign policy agenda as well as low political cost of the escalation towards Russia resulted in sanctions becoming a substitute for a foreign policy strategy and were not accompanied by the analysis of the situation, determination of goals and the parameters for evaluating the success of the policy. The deficiency of such an approach is accentuated by the comparison with the European Union who paid a higher price for its sanctions and, despite a popular in Russia notion of a unified “West”, not only resisted the will of the US, but acted as a deterrent for its actions.

Highlights

  • HearingEvaluating the Effectiveness of U.S Sanctions Programs. Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade (House Financial Services Committee)

  • The development of the US foreign policy tools in the 20th century resulted in sanctions becoming one of the most convenient means for achieving administration’s goals on the international arena, as well as a useful tool in domestic politics

  • Current US policy towards Russia is constrained by the framework of the sanctions regime, created by Barak Obama Administration in 2014

Read more

Summary

Hearing

Evaluating the Effectiveness of U.S Sanctions Programs. Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade (House Financial Services Committee). После расширения санкций в сентябре, приуроченных к визиту в США украинского президента, администрация заморозила санкционную политику, объяснив это необходимостью дождаться, когда санкции подействуют. Следующим качественным изменением санкционной политики стало принятие Закона о противодействии противникам Америки посредством санкций в 2017 г., однако это произошло в иной политической среде, как с точки зрения отношений с Россией, так и внутриполитической ситуации в США, а следовательно, заслуживает отдельного исследования. Поскольку изменение поведения не является целью, такие санкции, согласно Джумелли, используются, когда речь идёт о низкоприоритетных вопросах, связанных с низким уровнем угрозы, а также трудноразрешимых конфликтах или «криминальных» акторах, для которых нарушение нормы является условием выживания. В то время как для США характерна относительно высокая роль Конгресса по ограничению деятельности администрации на международной арене, «полномочия президента по введению экономических санкций в отношении зарубежных государств в рамках имеющихся статутов остаются практически безграничными» (Coates 2018: 170). Вмешательство законодателей во внешнюю политику посредством санкций хоть и имеет существенные последствия, зачастую происходит в контексте политических разногласий между двумя ветвями власти «в пику» президенту (Tama 2019)

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Findings
41 Web Special
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call