Abstract
Consider the case of a seller that can signal its own product quality but faces uncertainty about the cost of signaling. If signaling reveals information about its cost which can be used in future trades, how does learning affect signaling incentives and the informativeness of signals for buyers? Learning can reduce the value of signaling by introducing noisiness in the interpretation of future signaling decisions--the dynamic adverse selection effect. We construct and characterize properties of equilibria in which intermediate seller's types experiment with signaling. These experimental signaling equilibria are ranked with more experimentation leading to lower welfare.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
