Abstract

Dual-energy (DE) x-ray angiography with photon-counting detectors (PCDs) may enable single-exposure DE imaging of coronaryvasculature. To compare the iodine signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of single-exposure DE angiography with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and kV-switching DE angiography for matched patient x-rayexposure. In a phantom study, we determined the technique parameters that maximized the iodine SDNR per root entrance air kerma for DSA, kV-switching DE angiography and single-exposure DE angiography. We measured SDNR from images of a phantom consisting of an iodine step-wedge immersed in a water tank of either 20 or 30cm in thickness. We also imaged a phantom with simulated vessels embedded in background clutter and measured vessel SDNR. For this second phantom, we also applied anti-correlated noise reduction (ACNR) and calculated the resulting iodine SDNR. All images were acquired using a cadmium telluride PCD with two energy bins and analog charge summing for charge sharing suppression. The energy-discrimination capabilities were only used for the single-exposure DE approach. Optimized techniques were compared in terms of SDNR per root air kerma for two levels of x-rayscatter. For the same patient x-ray exposure, the SDNR of single-exposure DE imaging without ACNR was 75% to 85% of that of kV-switching DE imaging (also without ACNR) and DSA, the latter two of which had nearly equal SDNR. The single-exposure DE approach required ∼50% of the tube load of the kV-switching approach to achieve the same SDNR. For matched patient air kermas, the single exposure approach required only ∼25% of the tube load of the kV-switching approach. ACNR increased SDNR by 2.4 and 3.0 for kV-switching and single-exposure DE imaging,respectively. Photon-counting, single-exposure DE angiography can suppress soft tissues and provide iodine SDNR levels comparable to DSA and kV-switching DE angiography for matched patient radiation exposures. When ACNR is used to reduce DE image noise, the SDNR of single-exposure DE imaging and kV-switching DE imaging exceed that of DSA by more than a factor of two. Compared to kV-switching DE imaging, single-exposure DE imaging requires substantially lower tube loading to achieve the sameSDNR.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call