Abstract

A large number of signaling abnormalities have been implicated in the emergence and expression of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). The primary cause for many of these changes is the development of sensitization at dopamine receptors located on striatal projection neurons (SPN). This initial priming, which is particularly evident at the level of dopamine D1 receptors (D1R), can be viewed as a homeostatic response to dopamine depletion and is further exacerbated by chronic administration of l-DOPA, through a variety of mechanisms affecting various components of the G-protein-coupled receptor machinery. Sensitization of dopamine receptors in combination with pulsatile administration of l-DOPA leads to intermittent and coordinated hyperactivation of signal transduction cascades, ultimately resulting in long-term modifications of gene expression and protein synthesis. A detailed mapping of these pathological changes and of their involvement in LID has been produced during the last decade. According to this emerging picture, activation of sensitized D1R results in the stimulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and of the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa. This, in turn, activates the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK), leading to chromatin remodeling and aberrant gene transcription. Dysregulated ERK results also in the stimulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1, which promotes protein synthesis. Enhanced levels of multiple effector targets, including several transcription factors have been implicated in LID and associated changes in synaptic plasticity and morphology. This article provides an overview of the intracellular modifications occurring in SPN and associated with LID.

Highlights

  • The last two decades have witnessed a remarkable progress in the understanding of the mechanisms mediating the effects of dopamine replacement therapies in Parkinson’s disease (PD)

  • Striatal projection neurons (SPN) express high levels of two major classes of dopamine receptors: the dopamine D1 receptors (D1R), whose activation increases the production of cAMP, and the dopamine D2 receptors

  • Chronic administration of l-DOPA in combination with dopamine depletion results in up-regulation of two DNA demethylases, Tet3 and Gadd45b, in the striata of dyskinetic rodents (Figge et al 2016; Park et al 2016). In line with this finding, genome-wide analysis of methylation identified a subset of CpG-enriched sequences, in which changes in methylation occurred in response to both dopamine depletion and administration of l-DOPA. This subset was enriched in transcripts aberrantly transcribed in the D1R expressing dSPN (Heiman et al 2014), indicating a correlation between decreased DNA methylation and activation of genes associated with l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID), including fosB and arc (Figge et al 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The last two decades have witnessed a remarkable progress in the understanding of the mechanisms mediating the effects of dopamine replacement therapies in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Dopamine depletion alone induced gene alterations in both classes of SPNs. chronic l-DOPA treatment strongly affected the expression profile in dSPNs, but induced only small changes in iSPNs. Besides increased levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase-related genes, dSPN showed up-regulation of several markers involved in homeostatic processes (e.g. Rgs, Sstr, Kcnn3), which were most likely activated to counteract abnormal D1R transmission. In line with this finding, genome-wide analysis of methylation identified a subset of CpG-enriched sequences, in which changes in methylation occurred in response to both dopamine depletion and administration of l-DOPA This subset was enriched in transcripts aberrantly transcribed in the D1R expressing dSPN (Heiman et al 2014), indicating a correlation between decreased DNA methylation and activation of genes associated with LID, including fosB and arc (Figge et al 2016). The dynamics of the regulation of DNA methylation during LID, as well as the identification of specific targets for the development of effective therapeutic strategies, remain to be fully defined

Conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.