Abstract

Abstract. In December 2015, 195 countries agreed in Paris to “hold the increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST) well below 2.0 ∘C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 ∘C”. Since large financial flows will be needed to keep GMSTs below these targets, it is important to know how GMST has progressed since pre-industrial times. However, the Paris Agreement is not conclusive as regards methods to calculate it. Should trend progression be deduced from GCM simulations or from instrumental records by (statistical) trend methods? Which simulations or GMST datasets should be chosen, and which trend models? What is “pre-industrial” and, finally, are the Paris targets formulated for total warming, originating from both natural and anthropogenic forcing, or do they refer to anthropogenic warming only? To find answers to these questions we performed an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis where datasets and model choices have been varied. For all cases we evaluated trend progression along with uncertainty information. To do so, we analysed four trend approaches and applied these to the five leading observational GMST products. We find GMST progression to be largely independent of various trend model approaches. However, GMST progression is significantly influenced by the choice of GMST datasets. Uncertainties due to natural variability are largest in size. As a parallel path, we calculated GMST progression from an ensemble of 42 GCM simulations. Mean progression derived from GCM-based GMSTs appears to lie in the range of trend–dataset combinations. A difference between both approaches appears to be the width of uncertainty bands: GCM simulations show a much wider spread. Finally, we discuss various choices for pre-industrial baselines and the role of warming definitions. Based on these findings we propose an estimate for signal progression in GMSTs since pre-industrial.

Highlights

  • Global mean surface temperature (GMST) is undoubtedly one of the key indicators of climate change. Tollefson (2015) denotes the global mean surface temperature (GMST) indicator as “the global thermostat”

  • Estimates based on global climate models (GCMs) simulations are given by Hawkins et al (2017) and Schurer et al (2017)

  • Hawkins et al show that the GMST difference between the two periods 1720–1800 and 1850–1900 is small, around 0.05 ◦C, lying on the edge of statistical significance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global mean surface temperature (GMST) is undoubtedly one of the key indicators of climate change. Tollefson (2015) denotes the GMST indicator as “the global thermostat”. Global mean surface temperature (GMST) is undoubtedly one of the key indicators of climate change. Tollefson (2015) denotes the GMST indicator as “the global thermostat”. Over the years many articles have been published in relation to GMST series and the patterns therein. These patterns combine an anthropogenic signal – induced by growing concentration of greenhouses and processes such as aerosol cooling – as well as natural variability. Natural variability can be regarded as a correlated noise process consisting of (i) internal random unforced (chaotic) variability and (ii) external radiatively forced changes. Forced variability is mainly due to volcanic eruptions and variations in solar irradiance. It influences global temperatures on annual to centennial scales

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call