Sign, Play and Disruption: Derridean Theory and Sign Language

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between critical theory, specifically Derrida's (1997) critique of phonocentrism, with the experience of deafness and the status of sign languages. The case is made for an interdisciplinary approach to deafness and Sign that draws on a range of disciplines to reframe deafness in non-essentialised ways. The Derridean concepts of the ‘sign’, ‘play’, ‘differance’ and ‘supplement’ are applied to historical and current understandings of deafness, with particular attention given to educational practices. Derridean theory is used to disrupt assumptions about the status of speech and sign language and to consider how this might change understandings of language and identity. Counterarguments that question the usefulness of Derridean theory are addressed and the implications for social practice are considered. Ultimately, it is argued that Derridean theory can be used to question taken for granted attitudes to language that have led to the discrimination and stigmatisation of deaf people.