Abstract

Let $\Omega$ be an open, possibly unbounded, set in Euclidean space $\R^m$ with boundary $\partial\Omega,$ let $A$ be a measurable subset of $\Omega$ with measure $|A|$, and let $\gamma \in (0,1)$. We investigate whether the solution $v_{\Om,A,\gamma}$ of $-\Delta v=\gamma{\bf 1}_{\Omega \setminus A}-(1-\gamma){\bf 1}_{A}$ with $v=0$ on $\partial \Omega$ changes sign. Bounds are obtained for $|A|$ in terms of geometric characteristics of $\Om$ (bottom of the spectrum of the Dirichlet Laplacian, torsion, measure, or $R$-smoothness of the boundary) such that ${\rm essinf} v_{\Om,A,\gamma}\ge 0$. We show that ${\rm essinf} v_{\Om,A,\gamma} \gamma |\Om|$. This value is sharp. We also study the shape optimisation problem of the optimal location of $A$ (with prescribed measure) which minimises the essential infimum of $v_{\Om,A,\gamma}$. Surprisingly, if $\Om$ is a ball, a symmetry breaking phenomenon occurs.

Highlights

  • Let Ω be an open, possibly unbounded, set in Euclidean space Rm with boundary ∂Ω, and with, possibly infinite, measure |Ω|

  • We find its main properties, give basic estimates, establish isoperimetric and isotorsional inequalities, and we discuss the shape optimisation problem related to the optimal location of the set A in order to minimise the essential infimum

  • The proof of Theorem 6 relies on the relaxation of the shape optimisation problem (11) to the larger class of quasi-open sets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Let Ω be an open, possibly unbounded, set in Euclidean space Rm with boundary ∂Ω, and with, possibly infinite, measure |Ω|. This paper investigates whether the solution of (3) satisfies essinf vΩ,A,γ < 0 Whether this holds depends on the geometry of Ω, and on the size and the location of the set A ⊂ Ω. The proof of Theorem 6 relies on the relaxation of the shape optimisation problem (11) to the larger class of quasi-open sets. A natural question is to find the best location of the set A of measure c, which minimises essinf vΩ,A,γ This question is of particular interest for values of c close to C−(Ω, γ), as this gives information on where the geometry of Ω is most sensitive to negative values. If c is close to C−(B, γ), the optimal location is no longer radial This symmetry breaking phenomenon occurs at a value c ∈ (C−(B, γ), γ|B|), and is supported by analytical, and numerical computations. The proofs of Theorems 1–7 are deferred to Sections 2–8 below

Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 2
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof of Theorem 4
Proof of Theorem 5
Proof of Theorem 6
Proof of Theorem 7 and further remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.