Abstract

In the context of business groups, this study characterizes and tests managerial power as a zero-sum resource that must be actively pursued at the expense of other managers and affiliate firms. Affiliates compete against each other to capture shared resources, whose allocation not only depends on economic merits but also the manager’s power within the group. As a result, a negative shock to one manager can be beneficial to another affiliate by increasing its manager’s relative rank in the group’s managerial power hierarchy, leading to increased favoritism and value capture in the internal capital market. I find support for the “zero-sum power hypothesis” in the recent corruption trials against a key executive at the Samsung group. By parsing each sentence of the legal opinion delivered during trials, I identify a series of high frequency positive (negative) shocks that benefit (hurt) a rival affiliate. This study accounts for why the internal struggle for power is so ubiquitous, rather than being a highly qualified phenomenon limited to financially constrained firms, with novel implications to intra-organizational competition, family succession, and governance of business groups.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.