Abstract

In “patchwork” families, full siblings, maternal and paternal half-siblings, and non-related children are raised together, and sometimes, genetically related children are separated. As their number is steadily growing, the investigation of the factors that influence within-family relations is becoming more important. Our aim was to explore whether people differentiate between half- and full-siblings in their social relations as implied by the theory of inclusive fitness, and to test whether co-residence or genetic relatedness improves sibling relations to a larger extent. We administered the Sibling Relationship Questionnaire to 196 individuals who were in contact with full-, half-, or step-siblings in their childhood. We built Generalized Linear Mixed Models models to test for the effects of relatedness and co-residence on sibling relations. In general, a higher degree of relatedness was associated with better sibling relations, but only among those who did not live together during childhood. Co-resident siblings’ overall pattern of relation quality was not influenced by the actual level of genetic relatedness. In contrast to this, full siblings reported having experienced more conflicts during childhood than half-siblings, possibly resulting from enhanced competition for the same parental resources. The results suggest that inclusive fitness drives siblings’ relations even in recent industrial societies. However, among individuals who live together, the effect of relatedness might be obscured by fitness interdependence and the subjective feeling of kinship.

Highlights

  • IntroductionTheories on the mating pattern of prehistoric Homo sapiens and its hominid predecessors (Miller, 2011; Fisher, 2016) suggest that exclusive, monogamous relationships lasted only for a couple of years, typically until the weaning of the offspring

  • Serial Monogamy and Patchwork FamiliesTheories on the mating pattern of prehistoric Homo sapiens and its hominid predecessors (Miller, 2011; Fisher, 2016) suggest that exclusive, monogamous relationships lasted only for a couple of years, typically until the weaning of the offspring

  • We found a significant positive effect on quarreling and a negative effect on parental partiality, suggesting that those who meet only occasionally are less likely to engage in debates, and feel they are treated better by their parents than their siblings do

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theories on the mating pattern of prehistoric Homo sapiens and its hominid predecessors (Miller, 2011; Fisher, 2016) suggest that exclusive, monogamous relationships lasted only for a couple of years, typically until the weaning of the offspring. After this period pairs split up and formed new relationships. In this mating pattern, called serial monogamy, the costs of raising a child were mostly charged on the mother, and children usually stayed with her until reaching full independence.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call