Abstract
Horacek et al. (2021) commented on our publication arguing that we used an incorrect biochronology to define the Permian-Triassic (PT) boundary and that this inaccurate definition resulted in an erroneous interpretation of the oxygen isotope record in the studied Chanakhchi (former Sovestashen) section. Their comment gives us the opportunity to discuss in depth the identification of the PT boundary and to address some of the flawed arguments of Horacek et al.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
