Abstract
2D image quality assessment (IQA) and stereoscopic 3D IQA are considered as two different tasks in the literature. In this paper, we present an index for both no-reference 2D and 3D IQA. We propose to transform the IQA task into a task of quality comparison between images. By generating image pairs, the amount of training data reaches the square of the original amount of data, effectively solving the lacking of training samples. We also propose a learning to rank model using Siamese convolutional neural networks (LRSN) for quality comparison. The presented LRSN has two branches that have the same structure, share weights with each other, and take two image patches as inputs. The goal of LRSN is learning to rank the quality scores between the two input image patches. The relative quality score of a test image is obtained by first comparing its image patches with many image patches of other images and counts the number of times that its image patches are ranked superior to other patches. The experimental results on three 2D (LIVE, CSIQ, and TID2013) and three 3D (LIVE 3D Phase-I, LIVE 3D Phase-II, and NBU) IQA databases demonstrate that the proposed LRSN model works well for both 2D and 3D IQA and outperforms the state-of-the-art no-reference 2D and 3D IQA metrics.
Highlights
Digital images are usually distorted during acquisition, compression, and transmission
We show the top two performance values achieved by full-reference image quality assessment (IQA) or no-reference IQA models in bold and underlined the best performance values
We show the top two performance values achieved by fullreference or no-reference IQA models in bold and underlined the best performance values
Summary
Digital images are usually distorted during acquisition, compression, and transmission. The distortions usually reduce the fidelity of the images. Image quality assessment (IQA) has been a topic of intense research in the fields of multimedia, image processing, and computer vision. We use IQA refers to distortion related image fidelity quality assessment. IQA metrics can be divided into two categories: subjective IQA and objective IQA. The process of subjective IQA is often complex, expensive, and time-consuming. Subjective IQA is difficult to apply in real applications, especially in
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.