Abstract

Concurrent atomistic–continuum simulations are employed to study Si/Ge (111) semicoherent interfaces in terms of their responses to an in‐plane shear and interactions with lattice dislocations. Three types of Si/Ge interfaces, differing in interfacial structures and energy, are considered. Type I interface coincides with the shuffle‐set slip plane and contains a hexagonal network of edge dislocations. Type II and Type III interfaces both coincide with the glide‐set slip plane, yet they contain, respectively, a triangular and a hexagonal network of Shockley partial dislocations. The simulations show that among the three types of interfaces, 1) Type I interface is the least stable subject to an in‐plane shear and 2) Type III interface impedes the gliding of lattice dislocations the most significantly.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call