Abstract
Concurrent atomistic–continuum simulations are employed to study Si/Ge (111) semicoherent interfaces in terms of their responses to an in‐plane shear and interactions with lattice dislocations. Three types of Si/Ge interfaces, differing in interfacial structures and energy, are considered. Type I interface coincides with the shuffle‐set slip plane and contains a hexagonal network of edge dislocations. Type II and Type III interfaces both coincide with the glide‐set slip plane, yet they contain, respectively, a triangular and a hexagonal network of Shockley partial dislocations. The simulations show that among the three types of interfaces, 1) Type I interface is the least stable subject to an in‐plane shear and 2) Type III interface impedes the gliding of lattice dislocations the most significantly.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.