Abstract

The challenge of combining two unbiased estimators is a common occurrence in applied statistics, with significant implications across diverse fields such as manufacturing quality control, medical research, and the social sciences. Despite the widespread relevance of estimating the common population mean μ, this task is not without its challenges. A particularly intricate issue arises when the variations within populations are unknown or possibly unequal. Conventional approaches, like the two-sample t-test, fall short in addressing this problem as they assume equal variances among the two populations. When there exists prior information regarding population variances (σi2,i=1,2), with the consideration that σ12 and σ22 might be equal, a hypothesis test can be conducted: H0:σ12=σ22 versus H1:σ12≠σ22. The initial sample is utilized to test H0, and if we fail to reject H0, we gain confidence in incorporating our prior knowledge (after testing) to estimate the common mean μ. However, if H0 is rejected, indicating unequal population variances, the prior knowledge is discarded. In such cases, a second sample is obtained to compensate for the loss of prior knowledge. The estimation of the common mean μ is then carried out using either the Graybill–Deal estimator (GDE) or the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). A noteworthy discovery is that the proposed preliminary testimators, denoted as μ^PT1 and μ^PT2, exhibit superior performance compared to the widely used unbiased estimators (GDE and MLE).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call