Abstract

Sedimentary rocks of the Ocoee Supergroup crop out in the Appalachian Blue Ridge of western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. This ∼12 km thick sequence of strata was mapped as nonconformably overlying Mesoproterozoic crystalline basement (about 1.20–1.02 Ga) and beneath the lower Cambrian Chilhowee Group, leading to the traditional interpretation that the Ocoee Supergroup was deposited between about 1.02 and 0.54 Ga. This interpretation was challenged by Unrug and Unrug (1990, Geology, 18: 1041–1045) and Unrug et al. (2000, Geological Society of America Bulletin. Vol. 112, pp. 982–996), who claimed that Paleozoic fossils were recovered from rocks of the Walden Creek Group (upper Ocoee), and thereby created a new tectonic model for the origin of Laurentia. To resolve the age controversy concerning the time of deposition of the Ocoee Supergroup, diagenetic xenotime overgrowths on detrital zircon and diagenetic monazite on detrital monazite were dated by the U–Pb method. Sensitive High Resolution Ion Microprobe ages of diagenetic xenotime from three samples of sandstone (Thunderhead Sandstone, Cades Sandstone, and Shields Formation) indicate that the Ocoee Supergroup was deposited in the interval of about 580–550 Ma. A sample of Sandsuck Formation (uppermost Ocoee) yielded xenotime overgrowths of about 410 Ma, probably related to post-depositional low-grade metamorphism. Various origins of xenotime overgrowths may be distinguished by trace element distributions. Ages and trace element concentrations of monazite overgrowths support the xenotime age results, although concordia systematics are complicated by high concentrations of common Pb and inheritance of ages (∼1.2 and 0.6 Ga). These age data support the observed field relations for a late Neoproterozoic depositional age of the Ocoee Supergroup.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call