SHRIMP Ages of Zircon in the Uppermost Tuff in Chattisgarh Basin in Central India Require ∼500-Ma Adjustment in Indian Proterozoic Stratigraphy: A Discussion

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessDiscussion and ReplySHRIMP Ages of Zircon in the Uppermost Tuff in Chattisgarh Basin in Central India Require ∼500-Ma Adjustment in Indian Proterozoic Stratigraphy: A DiscussionA. Mukherjee and R. K. RayA. MukherjeeCentral Ground Water Board, North Central Chattisgarh Region, Raipur, India(e-mail: [email protected]) Search for more articles by this author and R. K. RayCentral Ground Water Board, North Central Chattisgarh Region, Raipur, India(e-mail: [email protected])1Second Floor, Reena Apartment, Pachpedi Naka, Dhamtari Road, Raipur, Chattisgarh, India. Search for more articles by this author Central Ground Water Board, North Central Chattisgarh Region, Raipur, India(e-mail: [email protected])PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Geology Volume 116, Number 5September 2008 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/590126 Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 8Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived 20 March 2008Accepted 13 May 2008 © 2008 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:A. K. Jain, D. M. Banerjee, Vivek S. Kale Proterozoic ‘Purana’ Basins, (Apr 2020): 235–294.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42845-7_5Piyali Sengupta, Arijit Ray, Sayantani Pramanik Mineralogical and chemical characteristics of newer dolerite dyke around Keonjhar, Orissa: Implication for hydrothermal activity in subduction zone setting, Journal of Earth System Science 123, no.44 (Jun 2014): 887–904.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0440-1Arunangshu Mukherjee, Ranjan Kumar Ray, Dinesh Tewari, Vijay Kumar Ingle, Bikram Kumar Sahoo, M W Y Khan Revisiting the stratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic Chhattisgarh Supergroup, Bastar craton, India based on subsurface lithoinformation, Journal of Earth System Science 123, no.33 (May 2014): 617–632.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0418-zD.K. Sinha, S.K. Jain, Kusum P. Naganath Tectonic Significance and Age of Doleritic Sill Near Bandhalimal in the Singhora Protobasin of Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India, (Jan 2011): 167–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12496-9_10A. Mukherjee and R. K. Ray An Alternate View on the Stratigraphic Position of the ∼1‐Ga Sukhda Tuff vis‐à‐vis Chronostratigraphy of the Precambrians of the Central Indian Craton A. Mukherjee and R. K. Ray, The Journal of Geology 118, no.33 (Jul 2015): 325–332.https://doi.org/10.1086/651502Partha Pratim Chakraborty, Ashish Sarkar, Kaushik Das, Priyabrata Das Alluvial fan to storm-dominated shelf transition in the Mesoproterozoic Singhora Group, Chattisgarh Supergroup, Central India, Precambrian Research 170, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2009): 88–106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.12.002Abhijit Basu, Sarbani Patranabis-Deb, Juergen Schieber, Pratap C. Dhang Stratigraphic position of the ∼1000Ma Sukhda Tuff (Chhattisgarh Supergroup, India) and the 500Ma question, Precambrian Research 167, no.3-43-4 (Dec 2008): 383–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.004 S. Patranabis-Deb , M. E. Bickford , B. Hill , A. K. Chaudhuri , and A. Basu SHRIMP Ages of Zircon in the Uppermost Tuff in Chattisgarh Basin in Central India Require ~500–Ma Adjustment in Indian Proterozoic Stratigraphy: A Reply, The Journal of Geology 116, no.55 (Jul 2015): 540–542.https://doi.org/10.1086/590127