Abstract

FGFR1 was recently shown to be activated as part of a compensatory response to prolonged treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib in several KRAS-mutant lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines. We hypothesize that other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) are also feedback-activated in this context. Herein, we profile a large panel of KRAS-mutant cancer cell lines for the contribution of RTKs to the feedback activation of phospho-MEK following MEK inhibition, using an SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099) that blocks RAS activation mediated by multiple RTKs. We find that RTK-driven feedback activation widely exists in KRAS-mutant cancer cells, to a less extent in those harboring the G13D variant, and involves several RTKs, including EGFR, FGFR, and MET. We further demonstrate that this pathway feedback activation is mediated through mutant KRAS, at least for the G12C, G12D, and G12V variants, and wild-type KRAS can also contribute significantly to the feedback activation. Finally, SHP099 and MEK inhibitors exhibit combination benefits inhibiting KRAS-mutant cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo These findings provide a rationale for exploration of combining SHP2 and MAPK pathway inhibitors for treating KRAS-mutant cancers in the clinic.

Highlights

  • KRAS mutations occur in about 30% of all cancers and account for approximately one million cancer-related deaths per year worldwide [1]

  • We found that combining SHP2 and MEK inhibitors led to enhanced antiproliferative activity and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway suppression in KRAS-mutant cells with receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK)/ SHP2–mediated feedback activation in vitro and in vivo

  • We took advantage of this quick and robust adaptive induction of phosphorylation of MEK at Ser217/221 (p-MEK) caused by MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and the extent of p-MEK reduction by cotreatment with SHP099 or RTK inhibitor(s) to measure the contribution of RTKs and SHP2 to the pathway feedback activation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

KRAS mutations occur in about 30% of all cancers and account for approximately one million cancer-related deaths per year worldwide [1]. One possible explanation is reactivation of the MAPK pathway due to the alleviation of the negative feedback modulation [5, 6], which is commonly observed in KRAS-mutant cells [7,8,9]. In such a scenario, prevention of pathway reactivation would maintain pathway suppression thereby improving antitumor efficacy. Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Online (http://mct.aacrjournals.org/).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call