Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that human maximal voluntary force is generally limited by neural inhibition. Producing a shout during maximal exertion effort enhances the force levels of maximal voluntary contraction. However, the mechanisms underlying this enhancement effect on force production remain unclear. We investigated the influence of producing a shout on the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system state by examining pupil size. We also examined its effects on the motor system state by examining motor evoked potentials in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the contralateral primary motor cortex, and by evaluating handgrip maximal voluntary force. Analysis revealed that producing a shout significantly increased handgrip maximal voluntary force, followed by an increase in pupil size and a reduction of the cortical silent period. Our results indicate that producing a shout increased handgrip maximal voluntary force through the enhancement of motor cortical excitability, possibly via the enhancement of noradrenergic system activity. This study provides evidence that the muscular force-enhancing effect of shouting during maximal force exertion is related to both the motor system state and the pupil-linked neuromodulatory system state.

Highlights

  • We examined the motor system state by examining motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1), and by evaluating handgrip maximal voluntary force

  • Compared with the control condition (195.3 ± 13.1 ms), the duration of the cortical silent period during handgrip Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was reduced in the shout condition (179.3 ± 11.4 ms)

  • There were no significant differences in MEP amplitudes between the two conditions during the experimental instruction or MVC task phases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When the background EMG (bEMG) activity was high (Fig. 2B), it was difficult to discriminate the MEP in a single trace. We calculated the averaged waveform of MEP (an average of eight recordings in the experimental instruction phase, and an average of five recordings in the MVC task phase for each condition evoked by TMS) to reduce the ­bEMG16,18. We calculated the peak-to-peak amplitude of the averaged MEP across eight recordings in the experimental instruction phase, and across five recordings in the MVC task phase. To measure the bEMG, a rectified EMG signal of the period approximately 100 ms before TMS was integrated, during which the force was kept at the maximum force level (Fig. 2A,B). The duration of the cortical silent period was taken as the time interval from the stimulus artifact to the return of continuous E

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call