SHOULD WOUND SWABS BE SENT ON ALL PIN SITE INFECTIONS?

Abstract

IntroductionIntroduction: Pin site infection is a common complication during treatment with a circular frame external fixator and increases time and support patients require from the limb reconstruction team. Wound swabs were not routinely sent by the clinical nurse specialists prior to this study, with most pin site infections treated as Staphylococcus aureus with flucloxacillin (clindamycin in penicillin allergy). The aim of this study was to ascertain whether routine sending of wound swabs in pin site infection would change antibiotic treatment.Materials & MethodsMaterials and Method: Patients presenting at clinic or physiotherapy with clinical signs of pin site infection were assessed using the Maz Oxford Nuffield (MON) Pin Site Infection Grading System© (OUH, 2021). Antibiotics were commenced as per unit guidelines and swabs sent for microscopy, culture and sensitivity.ResultsResults: There were forty patients treated with pin site infections. Swab results showed S. aureus in 60% (N=24), other organisms in 15% (N=6) and no growth or mixed skin organisms in 10% (N=10). Flucloxacillin was prescribed to 77.5% (n=31) of patients with the remaining 22.5% (n=9) of patients receiving clindamycin (due to allergy) or rifampicin and ciprofloxacin (due to a previous MRSA diagnosis). Antibiotic management was subsequently changed in only 5% (n=2) of patients due to one patient with a new MRSA diagnosis and one patient growing Enterobacter in three pin sites tested.ConclusionsConclusion: This study has shown that routine swab testing of pin sites does not usually change antibiotic management but should still be used in multiple, severe or unresolving pin site infections.