Should sodium removal in peritoneal dialysis be estimated from the ultrafiltration volume?

Abstract

In peritoneal dialysis (PD), ultrafiltration (UF) volume is the sum of solute-free- and solute-coupled-water removal, a dynamic process throughout the entire dwell exerted via aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and small pores, respectively. Determination of sodium sieving is used as a parameter for AQP1 function analysis, while coupled water removal is essential for adequate sodium and water balance and thus blood pressure control. The diffusive capacity of glucose via the small pores determines the dynamic crystalloid osmotic gradient. The osmotic conductance, i.e., milliliter of UF per gram of glucose absorbed, quantifies cooperation between small-pores and AQP1 channels. In continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, with dwell times beyond glucose-induced sodium-sieving effects, approximate dialytic sodium removal (DSR) may be estimated from the UF volume (in average 100mmol Na/L UF), while DSR is lower, with shorter cycle times, in automated PD (APD); therefore, effluent sodium concentrations should be measured. Applying dialysis mechanics, i.e., varying dwell time and dwell volume-as proposed in adapted APD to the PD prescription-may provide unmatched high DSR relative to UF volume, findings which are not sufficiently explained by the three-pore model of PD. Overall DSR should therefore be measured rather than estimated from UF volume.