Abstract

For N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients, modified radical neck dissection (MRND) encompassing levels II-V is generally recommended. However, routine level V dissection is controversial because of the low incidence of metastasis/recurrence in level V and the increased morbidities associated with level V dissection. This study retrospectively reviewed 646 N1b PTC patients who underwent unilateral MRND between January 1997 and June 2015. Specifically, to assess surgery-related outcomes of level V dissection, outcomes from N1b PTC patients who underwent unilateral MRND (levels II-V) were compared with those who underwent unilateral selective neck dissection (SND; levels II-IV) using propensity score matching. Overall and occult level V metastases were observed in 13.9% and 8.6% of patients, respectively. Level V recurrences were observed in only 2.26 (7.7%) recurred N1b PTC patients who underwent unilateral MRND. In multivariate analysis, three-level (II, III, and IV) simultaneous metastasis (adjusted odds ratio = 3.079, p = 0.003) was an independent predictor for level V metastasis. Under a matched condition, "shoulder syndrome" encompassing shoulder dysfunction and pain (9.1% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.002) was significantly more frequent in the MRND group than it was in the SND group. Because of the low incidence of metastasis/recurrence in level V and the clear evidence of increased morbidities, level V dissection in N1b PTC patients may be reserved for those with three-level simultaneous metastasis or clinically/radiologically evident level V metastasis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.