Abstract
AbstractInfant psychology has heavily drawn on the Violation‐of‐Expectation (VoE) method. In this piece, I analyse the assumptions that go into the VoE method by comparing it with other looking time measures. Reviewing key arguments in the literature, I argue that this method relies on too many questionable assumptions, that its conceptual foundations are thin, and that its findings are empirically not conclusive. Theoretical inferences based on VoE findings are thus too speculative to allow for solid progress in developmental psychology. Overall, while I appreciate that the VoE method has helped to make infant psychology a prominent field of research, I argue that it is time for infant psychology to move forward and to leave the VoE method behind.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
