Abstract
BackgroudIn order to maximize In vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates in advanced- age patients, it has been suggested to favor the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) over conventional insemination (CI), with the notion that ICSI would serve as a tool to overcome interference in sperm oocyte interaction and sperm oocyte penetration issues that can be related to maternal age and are not due to sperm abnormalities. We therefore aim to evaluate the role of ICSI in the treatment of non-male factor infertile patients aged ≥35 in terms of fertilization and top-quality embryo rates.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, data were collected and analyzed for all patients with non-male factor infertility, aged ≥35 treated, undergoing their first IVF cycle attempt with 6 or more oocytes yield, in whom a 50% ICSI-CI division was performed.ResultsFive hundreds and four oocytes were collected from 52 eligible patients. Overall, 245 oocytes underwent ICSI and 259 oocytes underwent CI. The fertilization rate was 71.0% following ICSI, compared to 50.1% in the CI treated oocytes (P < 0.001). The top quality embryo rate was 62.8% following ICSI compared to 45.5% following CI (P < 0.001). Subdividing the study population to two age groups revealed that the above differences remained significant in patients aged 35–39 yrs., whereas in those aged 40–45 yrs., the differences were non-significant but still inclined in favor of ICSI.ConclusionsThis study favors the use of ICSI in the older IVF population in order to increase both the fertilization rate and the number of top quality embryos that result per IVF cycle. Further studies are needed to establish our observations and use ICSI as the preferred approach to overcome egg sperm abnormal interactions related to advanced maternal age.
Highlights
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was developed for the treatment of couples with severe male-factor infertility to enable fertilization and pregnancy rates regardless of semen characteristics
Morton et al [4] reported that ICSI rescue attempts at 20–24 h after primary failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles resulted in normally fertilized oocytes
While Kastrop et al [5] found that ICSI yielded better results than IVF with high insemination concentrations or microdrops in patients with previous failed fertilization, this observation was not substantiated by Tournaye et al [6] who reported no difference in terms of fertilization between the two methods
Summary
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was developed for the treatment of couples with severe male-factor infertility to enable fertilization and pregnancy rates regardless of semen characteristics. In addition to severe male factor infertility, ICSI is currently being applied in patients with fertilization failure or low fertilization in previous standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. Morton et al [4] reported that ICSI rescue attempts at 20–24 h after primary failure of IVF cycles resulted in normally fertilized oocytes. Opinions are divided regarding the notion that ICSI will be used as the procedure of choice in all couples requiring assisted reproduction techniques in order to prevent up to 30% rate of fertilization failures in the first conventional IVF attempt [6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
