Abstract
Flight initiation distance (FID)–the distance at which an individual leaves in response to the approach of a perceived threat–provides a measurement of risk-taking behavior. If individuals optimize their FID, this distance should reflect the point at which the fitness resulting from leaving exceeds the fitness resulting from all other possible decisions. Previous theory of FID has often been aimed at explaining this behavior in foraging individuals. Yet flight initiation in response to approaching threats occurs in a range of contexts that might influence optimal behavior. In breeding individuals, risk-taking decisions that are made at a location of offspring care (e.g., a nest or den) can have significant effects on fitness. Here, we develop a theoretical model of distances at which a parent bird flushes from a nest in response to an approaching threat. We estimate parent fitness with regards to characteristics of the parent (reproductive values, detection distance, and cost of lost parental care cost), the nest (concealment and accessibility), and the approaching predator (detection capability and predation success), developing a dichotomous scenario between staying at the nest or leaving at varying distances. Using a generalized comparison of the benefits of leaving versus staying, we find that increasing costs of lost parental care, probability of predation of the parent due to fleeing, or current reproductive value lead to more instances of staying at the nest. In a complementary approach with specified parameters based on biologically-informed factors that likely influence a predator-prey encounter, we find that increasing the current reproductive value, concealment of the nest, or costs of lost parental care decrease optimal FID and can lead to the parent staying at the nest. Other factors, such as increasing residual reproductive value, predation success, and predator capability of detecting the nest, increase optimal FID with some instances of costs of fleeing being so great that staying becomes an optimal strategy. Our theory provides a framework to explain variation in FID among nesting species and individuals and could provide a foundation for future empirical investigations of risk-taking behavior.
Highlights
The way that prey respond to encounters with predators, like many other behaviors, is influenced by a balance of fitness benefits and costs [1]
We use the specific scenario of a nesting bird confronted with an approaching predator to present our model, but the theory and its predictions could be generalized to apply to any animal that provides parental care in a localized area
The generalized model provides a framework to understand factors that might cause an individual to switch between the strategy of staying at or leaving the nest during a predator encounter. This model does not provide specific insight into how optimal Flight initiation distance (FID) changes, these results suggest how an individual’s general strategy may change in response to a change in their environment
Summary
The way that prey respond to encounters with predators, like many other behaviors, is influenced by a balance of fitness benefits and costs [1]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
