Abstract
The purpose of this debate is to argue the merits of whether the availability of 24-hour transvaginal ultrasound service in every unit will help predict and, subsequently, prevent preterm birth. Any new test introduced will need to fulfil certain criteria. It must be acceptable in terms of risk, cost and patient convenience. It must be an improvement over existing alternatives, and it must aid clinicians to improve care. While the 24-hour availability of transvaginal ultrasound to every maternity unit may be useful to research and teaching, there is, as yet, little evidence that a 24-hour transvaginal ultrasound service improves perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Results from our own centre suggest that experienced clinicians can make an acceptable diagnosis of spontaneous preterm labour (PTL) using only history and digital examination. Based on these findings, the availability of 24-hour vaginal ultrasound in every unit cannot be justified for the diagnosis of spontaneous PTL.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.