Should Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistulas Be Used? CON.

Abstract

Fistulas continue to be promoted as the vascular access of choice due to their lower complication rates as compared with catheters (1,2). However, depending on the fistula cannulation method, the infection risk can compared with that of a catheter. Traditionally, cannulation is an area most physicians tend to ignore; instead, the choice and technique of cannulation is routinely left to nurses. However, given the pain, fear, and anxiety with cannulation that most hemodialysis patients experience (3–⇓5), all health care providers should pay more attention to needling. Furthermore, cannulation and its associated mishaps can lead to fistula complications of infection, and decreased patency. The most common method of cannulation among maintenance hemodialysis patients is the rope ladder technique, which rotates needling sites along the full length of the fistula. The area wall technique, where favored regions are repeatedly needled, is actively discouraged due to progressive weakness in the vessel wall and subsequent aneurysm formation (6). Buttonhole cannulation is more often used in home hemodialysis and it was first introduced as a measure to cannulate a fistula with a limited area for needling (7). Buttonhole involves a constant site of needling that, over time, leads to an epithelized track into which a blunt needle is inserted. Since its first introduction almost 50 years ago by Dr Twardoski and his head nurse (Sister Kumara), buttonhole has continued to garner widespread enthusiasm. Support for its use has been mostly promoted by observational data and poor-quality methodology studies showing beneficial effects on pain and fewer needling complications. Nephrology societies (8,9) (renal.org/guidelines) still recommend buttonhole use as a means to reduce pain and increase longevity. In order to promote a novel cannulation technique over the standard of care, there should be evidence of benefit and a lack of demonstrable …