Abstract

ABSTRACTResearch finds that, while people are pragmatic in response to crime control, individuals are more punitive toward violent than nonviolent offenders. This endeavor examines individuals’ simultaneous support for punishment and rehabilitation – balanced justice – for violent offenders with varying attributes. Using a convenience sample of 575 criminology and criminal justice students, this study examines if treatment beliefs and respondent demographic characteristics relate to sanctioning preferences. Findings indicate a balanced justice sanctioning preference for violent drug offenders, those with mental health issues, and veterans, while individuals support punishment-oriented sanctions for domestic violence offenders. Policy implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.