Abstract
While there is a general recognition that unrecognised epididymal obstruction (EO) may account for cases of vasectomy reversal failures, there is no consensus on when to perform a vaso-epididymostomy (VE). The recommendations have varied from a VE for all cases of intra-operative findings of vasospermia to only those with vasospermia and poor quality vasal fluid. This study is to determine when a VE is justified in men undergoing primary vasectomy reversals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
