Abstract

Abstract. In this paper, we studied the frequency of occurrence and shortwave direct radiative effects (DREs) of above-cloud aerosols (ACAs) over global oceans using 8 years (2007–2014) of collocated CALIOP and MODIS observations. Similar to previous work, we found high ACA occurrence in four regions: southeastern (SE) Atlantic region, where ACAs are mostly light-absorbing aerosols, i.e., smoke and polluted dust according to CALIOP classification, originating from biomass burning over the African Savanna; tropical northeastern (TNE) Atlantic and the Arabian Sea, where ACAs are predominantly windblown dust from the Sahara and Arabian deserts, respectively; and the northwestern (NW) Pacific, where ACAs are mostly transported smoke and polluted dusts from Asian. From radiative transfer simulations based on CALIOP–MODIS observations and a set of the preselected aerosol optical models, we found the DREs of ACAs at the top of atmosphere (TOA) to be positive (i.e., warming) in the SE Atlantic and NW Pacific regions, but negative (i.e., cooling) in the TNE Atlantic Ocean and the Arabian Sea. The cancellation of positive and negative regional DREs results in a global ocean annual mean diurnally averaged cloudy-sky DRE of 0.015 W m−2 (range of −0.03 to 0.06 W m−2) at TOA. The DREs at surface and within the atmosphere are −0.15 W m−2 (range of −0.09 to −0.21 W m−2), and 0.17 W m−2 (range of 0.11 to 0.24 W m−2), respectively. The regional and seasonal mean DREs are much stronger. For example, in the SE Atlantic region, the JJA (July–August) seasonal mean cloudy-sky DRE is about 0.7 W m−2 (range of 0.2 to 1.2 W m−2) at TOA. All our DRE computations are publicly available1. The uncertainty in our DRE computations is mainly caused by the uncertainties in the aerosol optical properties, in particular aerosol absorption, the uncertainties in the CALIOP operational aerosol optical thickness retrieval, and the ignorance of cloud and potential aerosol diurnal cycle. In situ and remotely sensed measurements of ACA from future field campaigns and satellite missions and improved lidar retrieval algorithm, in particular vertical feature masking, would help reduce the uncertainty. 1 https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6gKx4dgNY0GMVYzcEd0bkZmRmc&usp=sharing

Highlights

  • Most tropospheric aerosols are emitted into the atmospheric boundary layer, they can be convectively lifted above low-level clouds, or in some cases they are emitted at altitudes higher than the boundary layer and are subsequently transported over low-level cloud decks

  • We found the cloudy-sky direct radiative effect (DRE) in the SE Atlantic Ocean to be positive during the boreal summer (JJA) and fall (SON) seasons when the above-cloud aerosols (ACAs) is most active (Fig. 3a)

  • We found that the TOA DRE in the NW Pacific Ocean region significantly increases if nighttime Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) retrievals are used in DRE computations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most tropospheric aerosols are emitted into the atmospheric boundary layer, they can be convectively lifted above low-level clouds, or in some cases they are emitted at altitudes higher than the boundary layer and are subsequently transported over low-level cloud decks. ACA is an important component of the climate system because its interactions (scattering and absorption) with shortwave (SW) solar radiation (so-called direct radiative effect) could differ substantially from that of clear-sky aerosols or below cloud aerosols, for absorbing particles. The scattering effect of aerosols is generally dominant, leading to a negative DRE (i.e., cooling) at TOA. When aerosols reside above clouds, aerosol absorption of solar radiation can be significantly enhanced by cloud reflection, which can offset or even exceed the scattering effect of the aerosol (depending on the aerosol radiative properties) and can yield a less negative or even positive (i.e., warming) DRE at TOA (Abel et al, 2005; Chand et al, 2009; Keil and Haywood, 2003; Meyer et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2014). Model simulations of ACA DRE show extremely large disparities (Schulz et al, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call