Abstract

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Children with osteogenesis imperfecta suffer from frequent fractures and deformities due to skeletal fragility. Stabilisation of fractures, correction of deformity and intramedullary rodding result in decreased pain and improved function. Modern expandable intramedullary rods aim to provide lasting stability during growth, without an increase in complications. The aim of our study was to determine and compare the outcome of static Rush rods and expandable Fassier-Duval rods in terms of complications and reoperation rate. METHODS: We reviewed the records of a cohort of 17 children (seven female) with osteogenesis imperfecta (11 Sillence type III, six Sillence type IV) who were treated with intramedullary rods in the lower limb between 2011 and 2017. They had 64 rodding (38 femoral and 26 tibial) procedures (26 Rush rods and 38 Fassier-Duval rods). These were a primary procedure in 46, and a revision procedure after previous Rush rodding in 18 cases. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 66% (n=42). There was a higher complication rate in the Rush rod group (81%, n=21) when compared to the Fassier-Duval group (55%, n=21)(p=0.035). The most frequent complication in the Rush rod group was distal deformity as the rod is outgrown (69%, n=18). The most frequent complication in the Fassier-Duval rod group was intramedullary migration due to a failure to expand (45%, n=17). Factors that were associated with increased risk of complications included younger age (p=0.031), type of rod (p=0.035), and deformity as an indication for surgery (77% complications, p=0.033). At a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, the reoperation rate in the Rush rod group was 58% (n=15). Comparatively, at a mean of 3.7 years follow-up, there were no reoperations in the Fassier-Duval group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the numerous innovations, the surgical management of lower limb deformities and fractures in children with osteogenesis imperfecta remains challenging with a relatively high complication rate. The use of Fassier-Duval rods may result in a lower reoperation rate when compared to Rush rods, in the short term. Level of evidence: Level 4 Keywords: osteogenesis imperfecta, intramedullary rod, Rush rod, Fassier-Duval rod, fracture, deformity

Highlights

  • Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare disorder characterised by a spectrum of skeletal fragility and associated features due to collagen abnormality

  • We reviewed the records of a cohort of 17 children with osteogenesis imperfecta (11 Sillence type III, six Sillence type IV) who were treated with intramedullary rods in the lower limb between 2011 and 2017

  • The use of Fassier-Duval rods may result in a lower reoperation rate when compared to Rush rods, in the short term

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare disorder characterised by a spectrum of skeletal fragility and associated features due to collagen abnormality. Children who are affected commonly present with progressive long bone deformities or fractures Surgical interventions in these patients are challenging due to the combination of poor bone quality and severity of deformity. Expandable rods have the potential benefit of lengthening as the patient grows While this potentially reduces the risk of subsequent fracture or deformity, the use of these expandable rods can be associated with certain design-specific complications. These include failure to expand due to epiphyseal fixation failure and intra-articular penetration.[2,8]. The aim of our study was to determine and compare the outcome of static Rush rods and expandable Fassier-Duval rods in terms of complications and reoperation rate

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call