Shorter versus longer duration of antimicrobial therapy for early Lyme disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundAntibiotic therapy for patients with early Lyme disease is necessary to prevent later-stage Lyme disease complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares shorter versus longer antibiotic regimens in treating early Lyme disease. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to November 2023. We examined treatment failure, complete response, and photosensitivity. Short vs. long therapy was defined as ≤10 days vs. >10 days. Subgroup analyses included antibiotic type and varying treatment durations. Analysis utilized RStudio 4.1.2. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023423876. ResultsSeven studies, encompassing 1,462 patients, were analyzed. No significant differences in treatment failure, 12-month complete response, final visit complete response were found between short and long durations of antibiotic therapy. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses corroborated these findings. ConclusionShorter and longer antibiotic regimens for early Lyme disease show similar efficacy, highlighting the potential of ≤10-day courses, as effective treatment options.